Safety Assurance Declaration — Invalidity

Verified from official sources
SOR/96-433, s. 901.194Version 1Effective 4 November 2025Verified -

In plain language

A safety assurance declaration is invalid if the Minister has determined that the model does not meet the declared Standard 922 technical requirements, if the declarant has given the Minister a notification under section 901.195, or if the declarant has failed to submit the annual report required by section 901.199. Where invalidity arises from a paragraph 901.195(1)(b) notification, or from an outstanding annual report, the declaration is invalid only in respect of the operations described in paragraphs 901.69(f) and (g) and 901.87(b), and in the latter case only while the report remains outstanding.

Requirement as structured

A safety assurance declaration is invalid if the Minister has determined that the model does not meet the declared Standard 922 technical requirements, if the declarant has given the Minister a notification under section 901.195, or if the declarant has failed to submit the annual report required by section 901.199. Where invalidity arises from a paragraph 901.195(1)(b) notification, or from an outstanding annual report, the declaration is invalid only in respect of the operations described in paragraphs 901.69(f) and (g) and 901.87(b), and in the latter case only while the report remains outstanding.

Original regulatory text

(4) The declaration is invalid if (a) the Minister has determined that the model of remotely piloted aircraft system does not meet the technical requirements specified under subparagraph (2)(a)(iv); (b) the person who has made the declaration has provided a notification to the Minister under section 901.195; or (c) the person who has made the declaration has failed to submit their annual report in accordance with section 901.199. (5) In the case referred to in paragraph (4)(b) in respect of a notification referred to in paragraph 901.195(1)(b), the declaration is only invalid with respect to the operations described in paragraphs 901.69(f) and (g) and 901.87(b). (6) In the case referred to in paragraph (4)(c), the declaration is only invalid with respect to the operations described in paragraphs 901.69(f) and (g) and 901.87(b) and only for the period during which the annual report is outstanding.

Applies when

country
Canada
rpa size
small
operation
VLOS
regulatory category
Specific