Specific Examples of Significant Changes

In plain language

Changes to key personnel, operations affecting risk assessments, or non-editorial changes to policies or the operations manual are considered significant changes.

Requirement as structured

EASA accepts that changes involving operations affecting risk assessment assumptions, management system/personnel/ownership/location, or non-editorial changes to risk assessments, policies, or the operations manual should be considered significant.

Original regulatory text

With regard to the information and documentation associated with the authorisation, changes should be considered to be significant when they involve, for example: (1) changes in the operations that affect the assumptions of the risk assessment; (2) changes that relate to the management system of the UAS operator (including changes of key personnel), its ownership or its principal place of business; (3) non-editorial changes that affect the operational risk assessment report; (4) non-editorial changes that affect the policies and procedures of the UAS operator; and (5) non-editorial changes that affect the OM (when required).

Applies when

category

specific

regulatory category

Specific